Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/Thiemanndiv

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> PLUS₂(0, x)
GE₂(s₁(x), 0) -> GE₂(x, 0)
IFY₃(true, x, y) -> GE₂(x, y)
DIV₂(x, y) -> IFY₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
MINUS₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> MINUS₂(x, y)
DIV₂(x, y) -> GE₂(y, s₁(0))
GE₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> GE₂(0, s₁(x))
IF₃(true, x, y) -> DIV₂(minus₂(x, y), y)
PLUS₂(s₁(x), y) -> PLUS₂(x, y)
MINUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> MINUS₂(0, x)
MINUS₂(s₁(x), 0) -> MINUS₂(x, 0)
IF₃(true, x, y) -> MINUS₂(x, y)
IFY₃(true, x, y) -> IF₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
GE₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> GE₂(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> PLUS₂(0, x)
GE₂(s₁(x), 0) -> GE₂(x, 0)
IFY₃(true, x, y) -> GE₂(x, y)
DIV₂(x, y) -> IFY₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
MINUS₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> MINUS₂(x, y)
DIV₂(x, y) -> GE₂(y, s₁(0))
GE₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> GE₂(0, s₁(x))
IF₃(true, x, y) -> DIV₂(minus₂(x, y), y)
PLUS₂(s₁(x), y) -> PLUS₂(x, y)
MINUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> MINUS₂(0, x)
MINUS₂(s₁(x), 0) -> MINUS₂(x, 0)
IF₃(true, x, y) -> MINUS₂(x, y)
IFY₃(true, x, y) -> IF₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
GE₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> GE₂(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 9 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> PLUS₂(0, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> PLUS₂(0, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(PLUS₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₂
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS₂(s₁(x), y) -> PLUS₂(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS₂(s₁(x), y) -> PLUS₂(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(PLUS₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS₂(s₁(x), 0) -> MINUS₂(x, 0)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MINUS₂(s₁(x), 0) -> MINUS₂(x, 0)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(MINUS₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> MINUS₂(0, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MINUS₂(0, s₁(x)) -> MINUS₂(0, x)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(MINUS₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₂
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> MINUS₂(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MINUS₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> MINUS₂(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(MINUS₂(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GE₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> GE₂(0, s₁(x))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

GE₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> GE₂(0, s₁(x))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(GE₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₂
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GE₂(s₁(x), 0) -> GE₂(x, 0)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

GE₂(s₁(x), 0) -> GE₂(x, 0)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(GE₂(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GE₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> GE₂(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

GE₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> GE₂(x, y)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [21]:

POL(GE₂(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(s₁(x₁)) = 1 + 2·x₁

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

IF₃(true, x, y) -> DIV₂(minus₂(x, y), y)
IFY₃(true, x, y) -> IF₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
DIV₂(x, y) -> IFY₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

ge₂(0, 0) -> true
ge₂(s₁(x), 0) -> ge₂(x, 0)
ge₂(0, s₁(0)) -> false
ge₂(0, s₁(s₁(x))) -> ge₂(0, s₁(x))
ge₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> ge₂(x, y)
minus₂(0, 0) -> 0
minus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> minus₂(0, x)
minus₂(s₁(x), 0) -> s₁(minus₂(x, 0))
minus₂(s₁(x), s₁(y)) -> minus₂(x, y)
plus₂(0, 0) -> 0
plus₂(0, s₁(x)) -> s₁(plus₂(0, x))
plus₂(s₁(x), y) -> s₁(plus₂(x, y))
div₂(x, y) -> ify₃(ge₂(y, s₁(0)), x, y)
ify₃(false, x, y) -> divByZeroError
ify₃(true, x, y) -> if₃(ge₂(x, y), x, y)
if₃(false, x, y) -> 0
if₃(true, x, y) -> s₁(div₂(minus₂(x, y), y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.